Skip to main content

Denying the Truth

IT IS NO accident that we refer to God as the Truth with the capital "T." Truth has a way of getting through no matter the obstacles that those who want to deny it will put up on its way as long as people of good will do something actively to uphold it. In fact, even in the denial of truth, truth itself can be revealed.

At this early point of the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona, the truth made itself unsuppressable despite the attempts of the defense team headed by former associate justice Serafin Cuevas. It is understandable that the defense lawyers are doing what they think their job is in preventing their client from getting convicted for the Second Article of Impeachment. It is understandable, and in fact expected, of them to do what they usually do in criminal courts, going to technical objections on every turn in the hope that objections can suppress the truth with so much adversarial hullabaloo.

But what the defense failed to see is the fact that each time they tried to suppress an evidence against Corona, they are indirectly admitting that the evidence can be damaging to their case. And an evidence can only be damaging when it is consistent and supportive to the complaint filed against the client. It shows only that even the defense team knows, or at least suspects, that the client can be guilty as charged. That's the only reason to fear the evidence. That's the only reason to fear the truth that the evidence might bring into the case. Their attempts at denying the truth a hearing for the day telegraphs to the people that they feared the truth--the truth that their client is guilty.

Such is one fatal tactic that the defense team has fallen into. They forget that the impeachment proceeding is not a criminal trial but a search for the truth that is not bound to the rules of the criminal court; rules that can be bogged down by legal technicalities. The impeachment court does not need proof of criminal act, but of certainty that the client does not merit the peoples' trust. And what can destroy that trust the more is their obvious maneuvers at preventing the truth from coming out.

Had the defense showed itself open for the truth to come out, people will know that they too are there looking for the truth. That they too are there to confirm their confidence on the innocence of their client, and want to find out the truth by welcoming all the evidence that the accusers can present against the client; not to hide behind all technicalities they can summon to justify their objections against evidences. This fatal error can be the undoing of their case before the eyes of the Filipino people, and obviously before the Impeachment Court whose senator-judges are not blind to the motives behind these delatory tactics, these efforts to suppress the truth. 

Here's my unsolicited advise to the defense team. If they truly believe that Corona is not guilty as charged in the articles of impeachment, let the prosecution present all the evidence they can in order to clear out the air of suspicion building over the head of their client. Otherwise, they will lose this case, for sure, and in both courts--that of the Impeachment Court and that of the public opinion.

At the end of the day, the truth will eventually prevail in this trial. The Senate convened as the Impeachment Court that tries the Chief Justice is fully accountable to the people for uncovering the truth behind these allegations. If it cannot do its job, the heads of the senators will roll during the elections. And if the chief magistrate is indeed guilty as charged, it is high time that he be replaced from such a critical post in our democracy. Doing less than that is a sin whose impact can redound to future generations, and by its consequence unforgivable.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Skirting the Issues of Bad Journalism

AMADO DORONILA of the Philippine Daily Inquirer writes today about the perceived coercion that President Benigno Aquino III made on the press in defense of his "passion for flashy cars," and for  his lifestyle as a "pampered son of a wealthy family living an unfrugal life." I encountered some confusion on how Mr. Doronila reasoned out his understanding on how frugal life is meant to be lived. Does he meant to keep the money on the vault unused simply for the sake of not spending them? That will be a suggestion for a miser's lifestyle. Aquino may have "bought," actually exchanged, a third-hand Porsche for his old BMW for approximately the same valuation of P4.5 million. In effect, there was no significant money spent for the acquisition, except perhaps a sales tax if that applied. And here Mr. Doronila concluded that the new President of the Republic is living an "unfrugal life" (did he expect Mr. Aquino to sell the luxury car he had befor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Substate-of-a-Gun

THE MORO ISLAMIC Liberation Front (MILF) boldly declared that Muslims be allowed to run their government even "if they go to hell by their own making, so be it." I go for a lasting peace in Muslim Mindanao; but I have serious doubts on real peace when these armed Muslim leaders cannot accept the fact of life that Mindanao is no longer a Muslim territory after Muslim settlers took the land from the Lumads in the prehistoric Philippines. I came from Zamboanga, and grew there. Despite MILF's claim of representing the dream of Muslims in Mindanao, I have serious doubts if the leaders are merely using this separatist slogan for their own aggrandizement. Look at ARMM under MNLF's Nur Misuari who had nothing to show for the tax shares it received from the government. And reports had it Misuari kept a huge sum from this money for his own accounts. So I have so much reservations on the lasting peace settlement with the MILF can bring. First, how much really of our Muslim si...
Post a Comment
Read more

Embarrassing Pull Out

THE THING WITH the latest pull out of the Philippine military vessels from the disputed Panatag Shoal gives me a feeling that we have embarassed ourselves for getting duped into withdrawing from standing put in defending that claim. The current statement from the Chinese foreign ministry seems to say that the Philippines has the only responsibility to keep the tension down in the area; not the overreaching China. Somehow China managed to stand pat on its stubbornness in "defending" what is "hers" from the Philippine claim. If the Philippine politicians fail to get the message, then we as well admit our claim as much weaker (of low resolve) compared to that of China. Imagine leaving the Panatag Shoal on the excuse of protecting the government military vessels from bad weather. That's hollow-sounding to me considering that Chinese policy considers such a move a non-issue on their part. So much for our resolve to claim wha...
Post a Comment
Read more