Skip to main content

Separatist Tactic Unraveled

A RECENT INCIDENT in Davao City revealed the sneaky tactic that Muslim separatists use in claiming more and more lands in Mindanao as "their ancestral" land. Vice Mayor Rodrigo Duterte ordered on November 17 members of the Moro National Liberation Front-National Elite Security Unit to vacate areas in Sitio Agdao, Talomo and Mintal, which they claim as a land of their ancestors. True to form they have started harrassing those who are living there in order to have the place for themselves.
This was not the first time in Mindanao. (By God, even nations around the world had similar problems with creeping Muslim communities amidst them that can become breeding nests for terrorist operatives.) Provinces like the Zamboangas also noted this kind of creeping dominion; although in certain areas families and relatives of separatists did the subtle presence in certain areas where they later would show no plan to leave. Good that in Davao City they  have a Duterte who cannot be bullied or manipulated that easily. Other towns and cities do not have the guts to put pressure on these potential "ancestral claimants" later on.

While I am for peace in Mindanao. I am also aware that these separatists can be master manipulators, political liars, and outright self-serving. The recurring problems with these armed groups refused to find resolution for decades, and the claims for ancestrals increase with every new group that bring their claims into the negotiating table. The MNLF solution failed to satisfy a breakaway group, the MILF. And now although still far from reaching a resolution with the MILF, there is another breakaway again, the BIFF.

The issue on ancestral claim is a historically shaky one. For one thing, Muslims are not the first people in Mindanao, or in the rest of the Philippines for that matter. If being ahead provides the right to an "ancestral" land, that can only be claimed by non-Muslim tribes such as the Subanons in the Zamboanga peninsula, the Igorots in Mountain Province, and similar non-Muslim tribes in the rest of Mindanao and the Visayas. Although certain areas may have Muslims as the first settlers.

The rightful claim of the Moros are not ancestral ones, but the right for protection against illegal displacement from the lands they own. Unless Christians unlawfully took away Muslim lands, the Moros have no claim on the prejudice of Mindanao Christian communities. If a Muslim sell or barter their land in exchange of goods or money from the Christians, had they still have the claim over the land concerned? Our land laws, say, "No." But will these separatists stop and accept it.

The incident in Davao City is a proof that these Muslim separatists want to claim Christian lands as their own using guns and manipulation, or what have you.

It is inherent in people of good will to respect the rights of others, and not steal their properties away from them either by deception or outright gun-tottering. (This is something I cannot find among Moro separatists.) The peace situation in Mindanao is frustrating because of these evil motives of separatists even while the government generously makes serious effort to find peace there.

At the end of the day, while peace must be the prime rule, when dealing with evil however, people of good will must demand honesty and responsibility, and certainly a clear deadline where both sides must strive together to meet in order to establish peace. Otherwise, negotiations can be a waste of time, effort and money that can productively be used to improve the lives of people who sincerely want peace in their communities. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gifts of Discounts

SECTION 13 of the New Code of Philippine Judicial Conduct (27 April 2004) stated: Judges and members of their families shall neither ask for nor receive any gift, bequest, loan, or favor in relation to anything done or to be done or omitted to be done by him or her in connection with the performance of judicial duties. Its annotation explains that: Public officials and employees shall not solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any gift, gratuity, favor, entertainment, loan or anything of money value from any person in the course of their official duties or in connection with any operation being regulated by, or any transaction which may be affected by the functions of their office." The key phrase here is--"in the course of their official duties." It means that as long as a judge remains a judge of Philippine courts, this Code applies, prohibiting any receipt, directly or indirectly, from any person. The question then is: Is a discount a gift? ...

Substate-of-a-Gun

THE MORO ISLAMIC Liberation Front (MILF) boldly declared that Muslims be allowed to run their government even "if they go to hell by their own making, so be it." I go for a lasting peace in Muslim Mindanao; but I have serious doubts on real peace when these armed Muslim leaders cannot accept the fact of life that Mindanao is no longer a Muslim territory after Muslim settlers took the land from the Lumads in the prehistoric Philippines. I came from Zamboanga, and grew there. Despite MILF's claim of representing the dream of Muslims in Mindanao, I have serious doubts if the leaders are merely using this separatist slogan for their own aggrandizement. Look at ARMM under MNLF's Nur Misuari who had nothing to show for the tax shares it received from the government. And reports had it Misuari kept a huge sum from this money for his own accounts. So I have so much reservations on the lasting peace settlement with the MILF can bring. First, how much really of our Muslim si...

Humility Is Still a Better Way to Go

THE THINGS THAT Ombudsman Chief Merceditas Gutierrez may have or have not done are finally catching up on her. Fact-finding hearings in Congress simply unearthed strong bases to believe that she may have betrayed the trust of the Filipino people. On 8 March 2011, the Committee on Justice at the House of Representatives overwhelmingly found probable cause to impeach Gutierrez. About the same time the committee had its voting, the Supreme Court issued its ruling refusing to grant her Petition for Reconsideration. And two days later, the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee concluded its report on the Garcia Deal, and recommended that she "be held accountable for non-feasance." It is rare for a person guilty of a crime to admit so. So if Gutierrez betrayed the trust of the people, she can be expected not to admit so. That's obvious. But the outcome of the independent hearings of the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee and the House Committee on Justice, tackling differen...