Skip to main content

An Alpha Confusion

DAY SIX in the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona showed confusion in the court. And it centers on a tax reporting document that even Senate president Juan Ponce Enrile was not familiar of--the Alpha List. It is a list of single-income employees that their company submit to the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) in lieu of an employee's individual filing of her annual income tax return (ITR).

Prosecution private lawyer Arthur Lim knew the Alpha List well enough; he got serious problem cross-examining the witness, BIR Commissioner Kim Jacinto-Henares, without touching on the issue of ill-gotten wealth that the Senate, acting as the Impeachment Court, ruled as inadmissible for presentation of evidence. He attempted to continue at least three time, stumbled into the non-issue again and again.

Defense lead counsel Serafin Cuevas was in his elements. He obviously knew what is an Alpha list is. But nevertheless strategically tried to throw the prosecution off the track. He volunteered to confirm as correct and no contest all the ITR that will be presented by the prosecution, obviously in an attempt to prevent presentation. And objected when the Alpha lists will be presented instead of the ITR.

What added most to the confusion was the obvious unfamiliarity of presiding judge Juan Ponce Enrile on what an Alpha list is. And from all indications, he was about to rule that the Alpha list will be prohibited from presentation. In fact, when Lim manifested that the lists cannot be lift in Court because they contain other names, Enrile ruled that "then the evidence are inadmissible to Court."

This is a hilarious situation to watch. The interlocutors seemed not to understand what's going on.

Then, Senator Ralph Recto, impatient on the drama unfolding, came to the rescue. He obviously knew what an Alpha list is. And he succeeded in getting through the confusion, directly asking the Henares questions in order to elicit information that Lim had serious problem of getting to.

The prosecutors of course were the one to blame on this. Lim simply failed to effectively lay grounds for his cross-examination of Henares. Had he asked the witness to clarify confusion on the Alpha list, the confusion could have been prevented. In my mind, at day six of the trial, the prosecution are still fumbling in their presentation, even if practicing trial lawyers tried to help.

In situations like this, prosecutors are expected to have clear and well-organized logic to guide effectively the minds of the Filipino people in a way that makes the presentation of evidence easy to understand. No one can blame the defense; it is their job to muddle the issue in order to get a negative ruling on the articles deliberated.

At the end of the day, an evidence is useless if it cannot be presented to the Court, and done so convincingly.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Elite" Cry-Babies?

I CANNOT IMAGINE how an operative of the Special Counter-Insurgency Operations Unit (SCOU), when caught by insurgents and subjective to the worse torture imaginable, can ever survive with their mental faculties intact. But that's exactly what's going to happen if the recent products of SCOU Training cry foul, or more specifically 'hazing,' when they are subjected to the hard realities of law enforcent that handles counterinsurgency operations. Operatives must be physically hard and mentally sturdy to survive the prospect of getting captured without squelling reserved information to the enemy. I am disappointed to hear that the recent batch of SCOUT trainees considered their physical ordeals during training as 'hazing.' Have they entertained the thought that they were in Camp Ceferino Genovia in Barangay Bahay for an exotic 45-day vacation? If they cannot endure physical pain during training, they must ship out because real life counterinsurgency work
Post a Comment
Read more

Skirting the Issues of Bad Journalism

AMADO DORONILA of the Philippine Daily Inquirer writes today about the perceived coercion that President Benigno Aquino III made on the press in defense of his "passion for flashy cars," and for  his lifestyle as a "pampered son of a wealthy family living an unfrugal life." I encountered some confusion on how Mr. Doronila reasoned out his understanding on how frugal life is meant to be lived. Does he meant to keep the money on the vault unused simply for the sake of not spending them? That will be a suggestion for a miser's lifestyle. Aquino may have "bought," actually exchanged, a third-hand Porsche for his old BMW for approximately the same valuation of P4.5 million. In effect, there was no significant money spent for the acquisition, except perhaps a sales tax if that applied. And here Mr. Doronila concluded that the new President of the Republic is living an "unfrugal life" (did he expect Mr. Aquino to sell the luxury car he had befor
Post a Comment
Read more

Gifts of Discounts

SECTION 13 of the New Code of Philippine Judicial Conduct (27 April 2004) stated: Judges and members of their families shall neither ask for nor receive any gift, bequest, loan, or favor in relation to anything done or to be done or omitted to be done by him or her in connection with the performance of judicial duties. Its annotation explains that: Public officials and employees shall not solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any gift, gratuity, favor, entertainment, loan or anything of money value from any person in the course of their official duties or in connection with any operation being regulated by, or any transaction which may be affected by the functions of their office." The key phrase here is--"in the course of their official duties." It means that as long as a judge remains a judge of Philippine courts, this Code applies, prohibiting any receipt, directly or indirectly, from any person. The question then is: Is a discount a gift? On 3
Post a Comment
Read more