Skip to main content

The Lacson Travel Doc Mystery

AT TIMES THE application of law can be so shortsighted it can lose the essence of why laws are made in the first place.

Justice Secretary Leila De Lima is making a big deal on the mystery surrounding the travel document  that allowed Senator Panfilo Lacson to get back into the country from Hong Kong after 13 months in hiding. Of course, it is understandable that the Philippine Passport Act may have been violated. But the context of that potential offense was never to commit a crime but to avoid getting incarcerated for innocence of a crime that may have been made an excuse to persecute a critic of the past administration. If we understand a man who killed someone on self-defense, cannot we do the same on a person who wants to protect his freedom and the honor of the office he is serving?

I would agree with PNoy that getting deeper into the matter in order to put a legal claim on Lacson would be a waste of resources. It is tantamount to a law which had lost its spirit--that spirit that supports the protection of the innocent until proven guilty. Any person persecuted and his freedom threatened will take desperate measures, even violating a minor law, in order to protect himself from a government bent on getting back. I believe every common Filipino will understand that.

Well, of course, it is an affront to the Department of Justice and its law enforcement divisions for failing to get Lacson for more than a year. That is, Lacson has outsmarted them all. It is foolish even to demand from the senator to reveal his friends--friends who helped him in his most difficult of times (should not friends behave that way?)--or to tell them in detail how he outsmarted them (it is like giving a trade secret away that have saved your life so far)?

Moreover, don't government intelligence operatives also use fake documents in their undercover movements in order not to implicate the country who sent them? And will that be inexcusable in the name of national security? In the intelligence world, lots of laws had been bent and even violated in the interest of the country. Should the person's interest in protecting his freedom unjustly assaulted deserve less?

It would be more honest for the Department to admit that they have not the smartest mind in the country, and Lacson have made that clear to them. The Department should instead forget about wounded egos and focus on more important cases than this? Violent crimes, as PNoy said.

At the end of the day, laws are supposedly made to protect the innocent person and prosecute a proven criminal, and not to throw its weight around just to gain respect. Get real! Any Filipino who have Lacson's intelligence and connection will use them in order to avoid getting into jail for a crime he was innocent from.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Senate as a Protector of the Unborn

SHOULD SENATE BILL 2497 becomes law, the Upper Chamber would once again distinguish itself as a bastion of rationality and moral discernment in a Congress that has been confused over whose right must be protected the most--that of the mother, or that of the unborn child? The mother bill House Bill 4244, sponsored by Representative Edcel Lagman, believes that mothers must be protected with the protection of the unborn child given only a lip service. While Section 3(i) recognizes that "abortion is illegal and punishable by law," it does, in a twist of linquistic doubletalk, not support the idea that such is a serious break of the law; and instead proposed that "all women needing care for post-abortion complications shall be treated and counseled." It is like giving treatment and counseling to a serial killer after murdering a child, and then simply saying, "You may go now. Just come back to us for a regular check on your wounds." HB4244 is an all-mother bil...
Post a Comment
Read more

Embarrassing Pull Out

THE THING WITH the latest pull out of the Philippine military vessels from the disputed Panatag Shoal gives me a feeling that we have embarassed ourselves for getting duped into withdrawing from standing put in defending that claim. The current statement from the Chinese foreign ministry seems to say that the Philippines has the only responsibility to keep the tension down in the area; not the overreaching China. Somehow China managed to stand pat on its stubbornness in "defending" what is "hers" from the Philippine claim. If the Philippine politicians fail to get the message, then we as well admit our claim as much weaker (of low resolve) compared to that of China. Imagine leaving the Panatag Shoal on the excuse of protecting the government military vessels from bad weather. That's hollow-sounding to me considering that Chinese policy considers such a move a non-issue on their part. So much for our resolve to claim wha...
Post a Comment
Read more

When the High Court Starts to Misinform

THERE WAS AN ATTEMPT to misinform the Filipinos, coming from the Supreme Court lately through its spokesperson Atty. Midas Marquez, its Acting Chief of the Public Information Office. Midas claimed that he had an affidavit signed ( reportedly under pressure ) from the person involved in the distribution of official case documents of Ombudsman Chief Merceditas Gutierrez in her petition to have the High Court stop the impeachment hearing against her at the House of Representatives by the Committee on Justice, docketed as G. R. No. 193450. One claim said that copies of the 65-page petition (248 pages, including the annexes) were distributed and placed on the conference table of teh en banc session conference room on 14 September 2010. In a press statement issued dated 9 March 2011, Associate Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno put the facts clearly and unequivocally: "My office received the Petition on September 14, 2010, at 2:15 p.m. No other copy was received by me or by my staff either ...
Post a Comment
Read more