Skip to main content

The Pacquiao-Bradley "Fix"

SERIOUS SUSPICIONS START to surface lately on the probability of a fix fight in the Pacquiao-Bradley split decision that had the Pambansang Kamao on the losing side. I thought I was the only one on this suspicion; but apparently not.

Many are actually asking this difficult question: is Manny Pacquiao involved in the fix?

If you still can remember rounds one through five, Manny behaved so much like the Manny we know--strong, fast, both in hands and feet. But when the bell rang to start Round 6, Manny slowed down significantly, perhaps around 70 percent of the Pacquiao we know.

Could that slow down be a cue for the "fix" mechanism to proceed?

There are many benefits for a setup of such a fix. First, that's supposed to be Manny's last fight before he hands his boxing gloves. Losing a fight that can be convincingly one later on after Manny has tested what Bradley can dish out was no unavoidable loss, but a strategic one. It gives Manny an excuse to fight at most two more even he already made public his plan to retire after the fight. No Filipino will fault him for giving Bradley a rematch because he has to in order to save his welterweight belt as well as his legacy in boxing history.

Second, this apparent show of "weakness" in Manny Pacquiao has a potential to flush out Mayweather into a career-crowning battle of the century. It is apparently the same gambit that he made in his earlier fight with Marquez, again to appear seemingly weak, to motivate Mayweather to come out of his hiding and fight Pacquiao in the ring.

Third, the guaranteed purse sharing and his share on the pay-per-view reviews will not change with the loss. Money-wise the guarantee was on.

Fourth, the appearance of being cheated his belt made Manny more a hero in the eyes of the boxing world because he obviously won the fight, but failed in the judges. The sympathy of the fans was with him.

Fifth, Manny can regain his prominent title in the rematch because he is obviously a better fighter than Bradley. A third fight can even be arranged in a financially rewarding manner.

These factors are simply too rewarding not to be tempting for the Pac-Man. Of course, it is not saying that he hatched this idea, or even worked in setting up on it. Someone could have persuaded him to play this game at least before he bows off from the sports for good.

If this fix indeed occurred, it is not difficult to see who arranged this to happen the way it had.

At the end of the day, in a fair game, the better athlete wins the game most of the time. If Manny can be honest about it, he could have won the game convincingly but he did not, by choice or what we still do not know (he still has to explain to us why he slowed down in Round 6). If there's a fixing involved then what we observed gives a telltale story of it.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Senate as a Protector of the Unborn

SHOULD SENATE BILL 2497 becomes law, the Upper Chamber would once again distinguish itself as a bastion of rationality and moral discernment in a Congress that has been confused over whose right must be protected the most--that of the mother, or that of the unborn child? The mother bill House Bill 4244, sponsored by Representative Edcel Lagman, believes that mothers must be protected with the protection of the unborn child given only a lip service. While Section 3(i) recognizes that "abortion is illegal and punishable by law," it does, in a twist of linquistic doubletalk, not support the idea that such is a serious break of the law; and instead proposed that "all women needing care for post-abortion complications shall be treated and counseled." It is like giving treatment and counseling to a serial killer after murdering a child, and then simply saying, "You may go now. Just come back to us for a regular check on your wounds." HB4244 is an all-mother bil...
Post a Comment
Read more

Embarrassing Pull Out

THE THING WITH the latest pull out of the Philippine military vessels from the disputed Panatag Shoal gives me a feeling that we have embarassed ourselves for getting duped into withdrawing from standing put in defending that claim. The current statement from the Chinese foreign ministry seems to say that the Philippines has the only responsibility to keep the tension down in the area; not the overreaching China. Somehow China managed to stand pat on its stubbornness in "defending" what is "hers" from the Philippine claim. If the Philippine politicians fail to get the message, then we as well admit our claim as much weaker (of low resolve) compared to that of China. Imagine leaving the Panatag Shoal on the excuse of protecting the government military vessels from bad weather. That's hollow-sounding to me considering that Chinese policy considers such a move a non-issue on their part. So much for our resolve to claim wha...
Post a Comment
Read more

When the High Court Starts to Misinform

THERE WAS AN ATTEMPT to misinform the Filipinos, coming from the Supreme Court lately through its spokesperson Atty. Midas Marquez, its Acting Chief of the Public Information Office. Midas claimed that he had an affidavit signed ( reportedly under pressure ) from the person involved in the distribution of official case documents of Ombudsman Chief Merceditas Gutierrez in her petition to have the High Court stop the impeachment hearing against her at the House of Representatives by the Committee on Justice, docketed as G. R. No. 193450. One claim said that copies of the 65-page petition (248 pages, including the annexes) were distributed and placed on the conference table of teh en banc session conference room on 14 September 2010. In a press statement issued dated 9 March 2011, Associate Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno put the facts clearly and unequivocally: "My office received the Petition on September 14, 2010, at 2:15 p.m. No other copy was received by me or by my staff either ...
Post a Comment
Read more