Skip to main content

Ally Hoop

IF YOU CANNOT prevent the truth from getting out into the open court, move instead to eliminate judges that may likely vote for the truth.

Despite the official rationale that the defense broadcasted in its move to oust Senator Franklin Drinlon as a senator-judge in the CJ Corona Impeachment Trial, it is obvious that the hidden motive is to bring down the percentage of potential votes towards the truth that may be adverse to the interest of their client, Chief Justice Renato Corona. It is a number's game. The required minimum voters to affirm the Article 2, which is 16, will not be met. And their chance increases with one judge out.

The defensive move once again telegraphs their fear to get the truth of the complaint out into the open. If the fear among the defense team advocates exist, then truth may not be on their side. And the Filipino people know exactly what they are up to.

And yet again they have to realize that the rules of judicial court does not apply in the impeachment court. As is already obvious in Day 6 and 7, senator-judges have the right to cross examine witnesses in order to ferret out the truth. Senator Drilon did so alone. The same thing was done by Senator Ralph Recto, which helped clarify the confusion over the Alpha List. And that clarification resulted to the eventual presentation of the Coronal family lists for marking.

Are they thinking then that after Senator Drilon inhibits, they would do the same on Senator Recto? The absurdity of this move, tastes of desperation and the committment to avoid getting the truth out at whatever cost.

There is one thing that the defense team should not underestimate. The senator-judges have their own brilliant minds to depend on in sifting through this tactic. Their responsibility before the Filipino people to uncover the truth behind the allegations under Article 2 weighs more than the manipulative wiles of the defense.

At the end of the day, the senator-judges will be haunted not by the arguments of the defense but by how far they were able to ferret out the truth in this political exercise. And they are answerable to the people on that. The outcome of this impeachment trial will determine how strong the Philippine judiciary become. If Corona is guilty as charged but the the impeachment court failed to bring that out, the people will know when their senators failed in their responsibility of defending one public institution--the Supreme Court and the courts beneath it. The people will know; and they will hold them accountable for that.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Senate as a Protector of the Unborn

SHOULD SENATE BILL 2497 becomes law, the Upper Chamber would once again distinguish itself as a bastion of rationality and moral discernment in a Congress that has been confused over whose right must be protected the most--that of the mother, or that of the unborn child? The mother bill House Bill 4244, sponsored by Representative Edcel Lagman, believes that mothers must be protected with the protection of the unborn child given only a lip service. While Section 3(i) recognizes that "abortion is illegal and punishable by law," it does, in a twist of linquistic doubletalk, not support the idea that such is a serious break of the law; and instead proposed that "all women needing care for post-abortion complications shall be treated and counseled." It is like giving treatment and counseling to a serial killer after murdering a child, and then simply saying, "You may go now. Just come back to us for a regular check on your wounds." HB4244 is an all-mother bil...
Post a Comment
Read more

Second Chances

THERE IS SO MUCH to thank for in a second chance. But certain decisions and actions in life carry with it certain finality that once made a seal of fate closes other avenues but the one before the person. And he who learned from the evils of his past will be ready to face what might meet him in that road. At the time when Ramon Credo, Sally Villanueva and Elizabeth Batain decided to carry with them illegal drugs, and knowingly so as news reports indicated, they have made a decision, and followed it up with actions, that sealed their return path behind. Whatever circumstances that forced them to do it, they have made a decision to participate indirectly in the distribution of drugs that have killed so many futures, destroyed so many families, and took so many children away from the loving embrace of their homes. Without dipping their fingers into bloody wounds, they still have blood in their hands for the fee of thousands of dollars. It is like doing a Jud...
Post a Comment
Read more

Skirting the Issues of Bad Journalism

AMADO DORONILA of the Philippine Daily Inquirer writes today about the perceived coercion that President Benigno Aquino III made on the press in defense of his "passion for flashy cars," and for  his lifestyle as a "pampered son of a wealthy family living an unfrugal life." I encountered some confusion on how Mr. Doronila reasoned out his understanding on how frugal life is meant to be lived. Does he meant to keep the money on the vault unused simply for the sake of not spending them? That will be a suggestion for a miser's lifestyle. Aquino may have "bought," actually exchanged, a third-hand Porsche for his old BMW for approximately the same valuation of P4.5 million. In effect, there was no significant money spent for the acquisition, except perhaps a sales tax if that applied. And here Mr. Doronila concluded that the new President of the Republic is living an "unfrugal life" (did he expect Mr. Aquino to sell the luxury car he had befor...
Post a Comment
Read more