Skip to main content

The Lacson Travel Doc Mystery

AT TIMES THE application of law can be so shortsighted it can lose the essence of why laws are made in the first place.

Justice Secretary Leila De Lima is making a big deal on the mystery surrounding the travel document  that allowed Senator Panfilo Lacson to get back into the country from Hong Kong after 13 months in hiding. Of course, it is understandable that the Philippine Passport Act may have been violated. But the context of that potential offense was never to commit a crime but to avoid getting incarcerated for innocence of a crime that may have been made an excuse to persecute a critic of the past administration. If we understand a man who killed someone on self-defense, cannot we do the same on a person who wants to protect his freedom and the honor of the office he is serving?

I would agree with PNoy that getting deeper into the matter in order to put a legal claim on Lacson would be a waste of resources. It is tantamount to a law which had lost its spirit--that spirit that supports the protection of the innocent until proven guilty. Any person persecuted and his freedom threatened will take desperate measures, even violating a minor law, in order to protect himself from a government bent on getting back. I believe every common Filipino will understand that.

Well, of course, it is an affront to the Department of Justice and its law enforcement divisions for failing to get Lacson for more than a year. That is, Lacson has outsmarted them all. It is foolish even to demand from the senator to reveal his friends--friends who helped him in his most difficult of times (should not friends behave that way?)--or to tell them in detail how he outsmarted them (it is like giving a trade secret away that have saved your life so far)?

Moreover, don't government intelligence operatives also use fake documents in their undercover movements in order not to implicate the country who sent them? And will that be inexcusable in the name of national security? In the intelligence world, lots of laws had been bent and even violated in the interest of the country. Should the person's interest in protecting his freedom unjustly assaulted deserve less?

It would be more honest for the Department to admit that they have not the smartest mind in the country, and Lacson have made that clear to them. The Department should instead forget about wounded egos and focus on more important cases than this? Violent crimes, as PNoy said.

At the end of the day, laws are supposedly made to protect the innocent person and prosecute a proven criminal, and not to throw its weight around just to gain respect. Get real! Any Filipino who have Lacson's intelligence and connection will use them in order to avoid getting into jail for a crime he was innocent from.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Skirting the Issues of Bad Journalism

AMADO DORONILA of the Philippine Daily Inquirer writes today about the perceived coercion that President Benigno Aquino III made on the press in defense of his "passion for flashy cars," and for  his lifestyle as a "pampered son of a wealthy family living an unfrugal life." I encountered some confusion on how Mr. Doronila reasoned out his understanding on how frugal life is meant to be lived. Does he meant to keep the money on the vault unused simply for the sake of not spending them? That will be a suggestion for a miser's lifestyle. Aquino may have "bought," actually exchanged, a third-hand Porsche for his old BMW for approximately the same valuation of P4.5 million. In effect, there was no significant money spent for the acquisition, except perhaps a sales tax if that applied. And here Mr. Doronila concluded that the new President of the Republic is living an "unfrugal life" (did he expect Mr. Aquino to sell the luxury car he had befor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Substate-of-a-Gun

THE MORO ISLAMIC Liberation Front (MILF) boldly declared that Muslims be allowed to run their government even "if they go to hell by their own making, so be it." I go for a lasting peace in Muslim Mindanao; but I have serious doubts on real peace when these armed Muslim leaders cannot accept the fact of life that Mindanao is no longer a Muslim territory after Muslim settlers took the land from the Lumads in the prehistoric Philippines. I came from Zamboanga, and grew there. Despite MILF's claim of representing the dream of Muslims in Mindanao, I have serious doubts if the leaders are merely using this separatist slogan for their own aggrandizement. Look at ARMM under MNLF's Nur Misuari who had nothing to show for the tax shares it received from the government. And reports had it Misuari kept a huge sum from this money for his own accounts. So I have so much reservations on the lasting peace settlement with the MILF can bring. First, how much really of our Muslim si...
Post a Comment
Read more

Embarrassing Pull Out

THE THING WITH the latest pull out of the Philippine military vessels from the disputed Panatag Shoal gives me a feeling that we have embarassed ourselves for getting duped into withdrawing from standing put in defending that claim. The current statement from the Chinese foreign ministry seems to say that the Philippines has the only responsibility to keep the tension down in the area; not the overreaching China. Somehow China managed to stand pat on its stubbornness in "defending" what is "hers" from the Philippine claim. If the Philippine politicians fail to get the message, then we as well admit our claim as much weaker (of low resolve) compared to that of China. Imagine leaving the Panatag Shoal on the excuse of protecting the government military vessels from bad weather. That's hollow-sounding to me considering that Chinese policy considers such a move a non-issue on their part. So much for our resolve to claim wha...
Post a Comment
Read more